Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Human Rights Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that there aren't secondary sources establishing WP:GNG. If the page creator would like to work on this article in Draft space, let me know. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:50, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

International Human Rights Foundation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation. Article only cites the org's own website, and a search finds nothing even approaching RS sigcov (some press mentions, yes, but these are the org commenting on matters, rather than anyone writing about the org). Was copypaste moved into mainspace past AfC. Fails WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and New York. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Did a cursory look for sources and found nothing independent. Seems like it might be a snowjob. --WhoIs 127.0.0.1 ping/loopback 09:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I, too, fail to find any sources to show notability. The first few sentences are copied from Human Rights Watch, but unlike HRW, this organisation doesn't have solid sourcing in independent reliable sources to support these claims. A search for news sources only give me press releases from the organisation, and they are all pretty recent and deal with India or Pakistan related topics. In addition, I found this, from geo.tv which is not impartial but not obviously unreliable per this discussion. --bonadea contributions talk 10:14, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No Delete - The organization have even one milion of followers in Twitter and also 25k followers on Instagram, and should have an article in Wikipedia to differenciate this organization name with oder NGO's like Human Rights Foundation or Human Rights Watch. There are also relevant public newspaper comenting the organization. Is an error to eliminate the article. Wikijahnn (talk) 16:32, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then your job as the article creator is to cite those "relevant public newspaper comenting the organization" (sic); I carried out a BEFORE search and didn't find any. (Numbers of social media followers and similar metrics are irrelevant in what comes to notability.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.