Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Historians Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 06:27, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International Historians Association[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, No working references. Mostly futurology. May not exist. Rathfelder (talk) 22:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, likely hoax.--Grahame (talk) 00:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
~~Undecided~~Delete ~~as yet.~~ If it is a hoax, the article itself would appear not. "International Historians Association" has non social media google hits but I have not checked to see if they are the same organisation here. Importantly though, a trustee for "International Historians Association" was a registered business entity for Australian taxation purposes until 24 April 2017. I think existence is satisfied but not necessarily GNG. Also note creation was by a now indefinitely blocked account. Aoziwe (talk) 02:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Changing to delete. Readily fails GNG. Aoziwe (talk) 09:33, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Cannot see how this can be notable, even if it does actually exist. Ajf773 (talk) 09:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom; not verifiable. No working references, and none found on Google search. An unclear case for notability even if the facts in the article were supported by references. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:46, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.