Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Coalition for GeoInformatics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 21:59, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

International Coalition for GeoInformatics[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

the original article from 2005 [1] received zero citations after 15 years.[2] a blog post by the lead autor (J. Klump) declared the initiative defunct 10 years ago.[3] fgnievinski (talk) 20:45, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:51, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Couldn't find any sources aside from the announcement paper already linked in the citations, with the exception that the subject was referenced once with a short background in a book preface on google books (titled "American Paleontologist"). I don't see any good sourcing on google search/news/archives. Seems to fail WP:GNG for this reason. Do remember that notability is WP:NOTTEMPORARY, so if it was notable in the past it's still notable, however my belief is that it probably was not ever notable. K.Koopa (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 23:24, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. I see no evidence it was ever a going concern or, if it was, that it got any coverage or recognition either in general or within its field. Jbh ^Talk 19:28, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.