Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Brotherhood of Magicians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 05:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

International Brotherhood of Magicians[edit]

Page is an advertisement for the organization. Dave 18:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep - large, international, professional organization. 92,000 hits on Google!! Definitely notable. Needs to be edited to remove the advertisement-like parts. - Nortonew 18:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying it's not notable. I'm just saying that there's only a promo in the article space, and it should be deleted until somebody's written an article about it. Dave 19:29, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable organization. Ruby 19:22, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - it has some notability. - Latinus 19:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's a notable organization. I did some minor cleanup on the article to help alleviate the POV issues. Crunch 21:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - if an article's a mess, but verifiable you clean it up for pity's sake, not bring it to AfD! Jcuk 22:40, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep TestPilot 01:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep for all of the above reasons. If it comes off sounding like an ad, then be bold and revise the article. 23skidoo 02:36, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, please take them seriously --maclean25 05:10, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. This is a well-known and prestigious organization. magic.about.com[1] confirms that they're one of the oldest and largest groups in the US. Elonka 19:29, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.