Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Angora Breeding Farm

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

International Angora Breeding Farm[edit]

International Angora Breeding Farm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NORG could find no in-depth independent coverage after a search. Domdeparis (talk) 16:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. If it was world's largest rabbit farm and completely cruelty free (as claimed), that could be notable. What happened, did other rabbit farms overtake it or did it decline? This is an article that could have good sources in the local language, but more difficult to research in English. Also, if its heyday was prior to the internet, online sources might not be very helpful. Jack N. Stock (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The reference hillpost mentions Nagwain in Mandi district and Kandwari in Kangra district, but does not support the article's statement that the farm at Kulu "was the first farm in Asia to have a complete cruelty free environment".
    The reference ICAR Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute does not mention the farm.
    The reference kullu.net is the article's subject's own website and is not a reliable source.
    The reference List of rabbit companies in India does not mention International Angora Breeding Farm and does not support the statement "By the mid 1970s the farm had more than 17,000 rabbits and were employing over 100 full-time employees."
    It looks to me that the article is a blatant attempt to promote the company and provides untrue information. Apuldram (talk) 14:21, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The farm, as mentioned before was established a long time ago and in an area that until very recently had no access to the internet, which is why there aren't many things about the farm that can be found online. The reference kullu.net is a page from the official site of the town. Also, there is a lot of offline proof of everything mentioned on the article. Could you point me to how the offline material could be presented to support the statements in the article?Karanparmar99 (talk) 16:17, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.