Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Academy of Financial Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 19:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

International Academy of Financial Management

Declining mistaken WP:CSD#G4 tag, but there are no Google Book hits and no Google News hits. There are a lot of Google hits; I think the company probably isn't notable per WP:CORP, but I'm not sure. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:01, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This was deleted before under G11 (spam) and though that is borderline here, this still doesn't pass WP:N. I only found 22 hits on google for "International Academy of Financial Management", which isn't "a lot" to me. Those hits only take you to linkfarms in pages of other nonnotable organizations. Them From Space 02:07, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable group or corporation. Apparently (according to all the chatter regarding American Academy of Financial Management), some members of AAFM were dissatisfied and decided to form the IAFM, but the legitimacy of this move is disputed. Yet this dispute is not covered in any news source that Google News indexes [1]. So, either the IAFM is a hoax (what the advocates of the AAFM article claim) or it is not notable enough for any reliable source to take an interest in the story. Either way, fails WP:ORG. [btw, I'm the one who nominated this for a G4 speedy deletion] RJC ^Talk_Contribs 06:43, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No notability shown in this article about a minor, apparently schismatic trade association. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.