Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interflop (2nd nom)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by Jimfbleak as patent nonsense. Stifle 15:20, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
tagged for speedy, then listed for Afd with a link to the previous AfD discussion (which is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interflop). Completign the nomination. Abstain. DES (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
These comments were made on the original Interflop AfD. Since they were made before this article was created, I decided to move them above the other votes. --Deathphoenix 20:08, 10 January 2006 (UTC) Was deleted before and somehow was brought back, still not notable. Macks 13:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete under CSDG4. I have tagged the article as such. Zunaid 15:07, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as per Zunaid. Essexmutant 16:12, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and protect, not a G4 speedy. This article is different from the previously deleted content (most of which consisted of repeat profanities or nonsense text). However, this web site is not notable, and its constant recreation leads me to think that a {{deleted}} protect is in order. --Deathphoenix 16:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- loltheinternet, If you delete them then the communist-nazis have won. Is that what you want... do you want your children to grow up in a land full of terrorists? For shame. - Ridin Spinnas, lolxboxishuge
- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.68.76.7 (talk • contribs) .
Do not delete This was maintained for so long and was going very well. If other internet forums deserve a wiki entry, so does Interflop. Interflop had many google entries until it was temporarily shut down and brought back. On google, interflop at one point had well over 100,000 hits. It deserves an entry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.127.20.190 (talk • contribs) .
- Delete- yet another non-notable forum. Reyk 19:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
End of move from the other AfD.
- Delete. NN website, does not meet WP:WEB. Alexa rank of 467,242 and currently only 67 unique Google hits. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:58, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn forum. Eusebeus 22:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, yawn, ignore the sox, block the one who likes to use inappropriate language. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn garbage. --kingboyk 00:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nn forumcruft. FCYTravis 03:48, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable web forums. Dear God, another Christ of the YTMND forums, which ain't exactly the cream of the crop. And I think a lot of people here are confused - "Do not delete"? Haha. Cyde Weys votetalk 04:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Commment -- no point in voting since the edit history discloses article was never deleted despite AfD closure above on page. Must be a cabal matter, which (IMHO) means it will never be deleted. -- SockpuppetSamuelson 08:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- See its entry on WP:DRV --- Charles Stewart 15:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Zoe --- Charles Stewart 15:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It's been deleted fourteen times. That's more than enough to delete and padlock. Stifle 15:19, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.