Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intentional vagueness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was MERGE to Propaganda. -Splashtalk 22:58, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Intentional vagueness[edit]
Vote that material be merged into Propaganda article (where it is already covered in substantial detail, and page be made a redirect to Propaganda —Gaff talk 04:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- See also: Unstated assumption—Gaff talk 04:17, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. as per nomination. freshgavin 05:13, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete contents, and replace with redirect as this is already covered in propaganda, as well as in glittering generalities. Bjelleklang - talk 08:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Same reason as Bjelleklang. Content covered in propaganda. Comics 16:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per nom. --MacRusgail 16:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.