Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellitouch Tuner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Electronic tuner. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:30, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Intellitouch Tuner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable - examination of the sources shows they aren't independent of the company. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 13:45, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 14:35, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:11, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to electronic tuner, per WP:PRODUCT. There's a claim that At the time it was created, it was the first of its kind, and a huge leap of innovation. Using a musical instrument's vibrations to measure pitch by a device that attaches by a clip had never been done before. This statement (particularly if it can be sourced) seems to be at least worthy of inclusion elsewhere. -- Trevj (talk) 10:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to electronic tuner as per Trev. Refs are catalogs and press releases. I've found the tuner described in independent product reviews but that doesn't reach the threshold of notability I'm looking for. -—Kvng 22:06, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.