Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intellinetics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Intellinetics[edit]

Intellinetics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Sources are a company announcement, a couple-paragraph mention of controversy in an NYT article, and an SEC form. BEFORE didn't turn up any RS coverage. I don't believe the controversy in the NYT article is sufficient to justify its own article; it's listed as one of several companies that have used COVID bailout money in inappropriate ways. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.