Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligent document

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Intelligent document[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article has been tagged as unsourced for over a decade - I did a Google search and the subject does not seem to be notable. Chidgk1 (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Electronic document: or Merge if sourcing can be found for any of the contents. Owen× ☎ 21:38, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Disputed prod so don't want to take a 'soft-redirect' approach, better to relist to form consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The discussion seems to have migrated to E-paper and various iterations of the PDF format, now using e-signatures and the like. I don't think this caught on as a concept, I can only find things about PDF. Oaktree b (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:06, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Also, the article would be orphaned if not a few See also listings. Suitskvarts (talk) 14:08, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.