Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelitek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Star Mississippi 15:44, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Intelitek

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 05:26, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Education, Technology, and New Hampshire. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:47, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The nominator deleted a substantial amount of sourced (perhaps not pristinely-sourced, but sourced) content before then making this call for deletion. A scan of old newspaper archives does show about a half-dozen independently published stories that at least mention Intelitek, some in more than just passing detail. Seems that this article easily could be rescued, but as its creator, I hesitate to do so myself. Community consensus should prevail; but it just felt like this wasn't an objective nomination, initiated after nearly half the article had been gutted without any discussion. - Swiss Mister in NY (talk) 14:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Passing mentions and churnalism don't make notability. There's a strong possibility that UPE were involved which is why you get such coverage of non-notable subjects. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:09, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the editor is a WP:UPE as well. scope_creep^Talk 15:56, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:34, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.