Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integration of church and culture in China

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Integration of church and culture in China[edit]

Violates WP:OR, is persuasive instead of encyclopedic SkerHawx 19:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Is probably a copyright violation. TheRingess 19:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the same, so I searched a couple of places, and did a few text searches within Google, Google Scholar, and Amazon and didn't come up with outright copyright. Otherwise I would've speedied... Thx. SkerHawx 20:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If not a copyright violation it is almost certainly a non-published paper consisting of original research WP:OR. Arnoutf 20:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I believe it's a cut and paste from the user's own paper, not a copyright violation, although it may very well be original research. Mak (talk) 21:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR copyvio (no release to use in Wikipedia = copyvio). ColourBurst 23:14, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if the original author with the authority to release rights posted it on Wikipedia, that posting is equivalent to releasing it under the GFDL. (=not a copyvio) Mak (talk) 14:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment while this is true, we can't determine this solely from a username. They'd have to provide proof that they wrote the article in question. ColourBurst 15:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Regardless of whether it's a copyvio, it's certainly a persuasive piece of OR. SkerHawx 17:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unsalvagable original research essay. --Czj 17:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.