Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated biotectural system

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated biotectural system

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

1. WP:NOT advert Reads like a press release for an indiscernible product that didn't happen. 2. WP:N Failed to WP:V with so many dead links that make me question if there's any RS for this, and PROD and number of editors questioning both of these on the talk means it should be AfDed Widefox; talk 23:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.