Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Integrated KM Cycle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Integrated KM Cycle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is an unnecessary content fork of Knowledge Management which already discusses a KM cycle. There are sources in Google Books that could be added to substantiate the term "Integrated KM Cycle" but notability is not the issue for this nomination. Ash (talk) 13:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 13:57, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. An essay of original research with a single source, likely promotional in intent. And this is also the sort of text, full of glittering generalities and peacock terms, but so abstract and vague to be effectively meaningless, that nobody can reasonably be expected to make sense of: Business Perspective - Knowledge management is a business activity that is reflected in strategy, policy, and practice throughout the organization. / Cognitive Science - Fundamental resource that allows us to function properly. / Process/Technology - A systematic approach to manage and use information that will provide a continuous flow of knowledge that enables efficient and effective decision making. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not worth a separate article and I doubt if there is mergable content. DGG ( talk ) 19:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.