Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instaposting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 07:52, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Instaposting[edit]

Dicdef, neologism, no evidence of common use. I actually created this article myself when I was new to Wikipedia, before I even had an account, and wasn't aware of policy regarding dicdefs - I was pretty surprised to see it still up. Since I created as an anon I guess I can't ask for a speedy. Delete. Malthusian (talk) 13:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. PJM 14:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 22:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 03:05, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-13 06:20Z
Delete per nom. I don't think anyone would mind a dose of WP:IAR to delete this per author request, if any admin is coming by. Stifle 01:18, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.