Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InsideSales.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 22:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

InsideSales.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hate to AFD it so fast after creation, but extensive searching finds nothing to establish notability. I did find one interesting article, but it was written by one of the founders (on Forbes). Promotional article about a company that doesn't pass WP:CORP at this time, no matter how much we edit it. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, advertising, and the sort of business that just won't ever be an encyclopedia subject: Its primary product is dialing technology embedded inside customer relationship management (CRM) software. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nomination. The refs seem to be things that mention the product in passing, rather than the kind of writeups that would indicate notability. I note in passing that this article has been speedy-deleted three times in the past, too. Pseudomonas_(talk) 12:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder also if there's also a link between Leo D is Me and Leo Dirr, "Content alchemist at http://InsideSales.com" [1]. Pseudomonas_(talk) 15:18, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 13:07, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.