Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inocentrus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:47, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inocentrus[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This genus is only described in thesis,[1] and this is not considered as valid taxa. (See [2]) Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 00:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and History. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete following OP. The only available instance of the thesis in question appears to be fragmentary, so it's hard to figure out what exactly is presented there, but the assertion of [3] that there exists no valid description seems to be borne out by the paucity of mentions anywhere else. There are a couple publications by one author from the 90s that refer to the species [4][5], but that's it. On balance of available material, this taxon does not seem to have a solid enough background for an article. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I got full PDF of that thesis, and it describes about this taxa well but still it is invalid, same situation as "Styginetta" etc. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add: This record also indicates a doubtful status. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not formally published so it doesn't meet the presumption underlying WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. Plantdrew (talk) 16:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.