Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovation Works (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Innovation Works

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory like listing on an unremarkable venture fund. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/Cyounkins with no other contributions outside this topic. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH.

First AfD closed as "no consensus" in 2013. NCORP has been significantly tightened since then so it's a good time to revisit. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional article about an unremarkable venture capital fund. MER-C 11:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not entirely sure why consensus couldn't be reached in 2013. It didn't satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH then and it doesn't satisfy it now. Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.