Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Injective Labs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 02:36, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Injective Labs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I do not believe there is sufficient mainstream reliable news coverage independent of the topic here, per WP:CORP and WP:NCRYPTO. Uhooep (talk) 01:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Companies, Technology, and Internet. C F A 💬 02:22, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Is Techcrunch WP:RS? Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The general guidance for TechCrunch is to carefully evaluate who is speaking (

WP:TECHCRUNCH). The (~~TechCrunch article is~~) two TechCrunch articles are routine business buzz, heavily reliant on what the company says, failing both the significance and independence tests of WP:CORPDEPTH. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article is heavily reliant to WP:TECHCRUNCH. TechCrunch may be useful for satisfying verifiability, but may be less useful for the purpose of determining notability. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 06:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - References are all routine announcements or churnalism. In this instance, the TechCrunch articles could be used to cite content on the page, but not used to establish notability. They are bylined articles but the majority of the information comes from the company (likely press release which TechCrunch likes to rewrite and publish as their own content). --CNMall41 (talk) 18:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the sourcing meets GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:34, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.