Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingelore Ebberfeld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:27, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Ingelore Ebberfeld

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ingelore Ebberfeld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:AUTHOR. No indication of: 1. Regarded as important or central figure. 2. Innovation of concept or technique. 3. Creation of well-known body of work. 4. Critical attention, exhibition or the like. Source searches in both English and German show little in the way of substantial coverage or attention. The German Wikipedia article is an exact replica (just in German). StraussInTheHouse (talk) 13:23, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:04, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

• Delete a non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:46, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
• Delete per JPL. Impossible to find sufficient reliable sources to indicate depth or persistance of coverage as to indicate notability under the most basic requirements of WP:ANYBIO. ——SerialNumber54129 17:20, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.