Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inga S. Bernstein

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies. As with Winfield D. Ong, the argument against redirecting is weak. Vanamonde (Talk) 16:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inga S. Bernstein

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Failed judicial nominee who does not pass WP:GNG. All sources are primary or namedrops. Let'srun (talk) 09:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Law, and Massachusetts. Let'srun (talk) 09:34, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Barack Obama judicial appointment controversies as we're generally doing for these now —siro χ o 10:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The reason I'm not proposing a redirect is that there isn't much to suggest that Bernstein was a controversial nominee, and her WP:BLP1E isn't covered in that article, as seen by her passing through the Senate Judiciary Committee with only 1 senator voting against the nomination. It appears that she simply never received a vote before the end of Obama's 2nd term, and I don't see any other possible redirect targets Let'srun (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, support siroχo's suggestion, above. While that article includes information about controversy in Obama's nominations, it's also a comprehensive list of all his nominees that were never confirmed. Many of them have their own pages, since becoming a nominee for the federal bench usually includes achievements that pass WP:GNG. In the interest of keeping that list complete, she should probably be redirected there even if her page is deleted. Kalethan (talk) 18:00, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.