Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infoanarchism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:52, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infoanarchism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This neologism has no wider use outside of the title of the Time article whence it came. There isn't a school or followers of "infoanarchism". It isn't used at Ian Clarke (computer scientist)—the subject of the Time article—or any closely related concept: crypto-anarchism, free culture, etc. Even if the term was used in any cursory form outside this Wikipedia entry, we don't have a more established encyclopedia topic for "people opposed to intellectual property and censorship" to make for a decent redirect retarget (the criticism would just be covered in the parent article), hence the rationale for outright deletion. czar 04:38, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. czar 04:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. czar 04:39, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom as non-notable neologism from the year 2000 with absolutely no staying power. --Lockley (talk) 01:22, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails GNG. Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:17, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 13:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Kudos to the original author. Well written, however unsource able. The only mention is the one Time article and here. ShoesssS ^Talk 14:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.