Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infinity Blade 3 glitches and suggestions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:RHaworth per CSD A10, "Recently created article that duplicates an existing topic, Infinity Blade III". (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infinity Blade 3 glitches and suggestions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This isn't formatted as an article. The author leaves there info at the top and has open questions to other editors (things that would make sense in the talk page) in the article itself. it's not even exactly clear what the topic is but whatever it is it's clearly a personal opinion piece with no references and no notability. MadScientistX11 (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete not even a real article. --Jakob (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:NOR, WP:NOTHOWTO and WP:NOTFORUM. LowLevel73^(talk) 20:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: an editor has asked for a speedy deletion under WP:A10. I didn't ask for a speedy deletion because I wasn't able to find an applicable criteria and I'm not sure how A10 is relevant to the issue, here. I'm curious to see whether the article will be speedy deleted even if the cited criteria does not really apply. LowLevel73^(talk) 21:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A10 might be OK, but anyway this'll go sooner or later. We don't have pages of suggestions, cheats, recipes, poems, stories on Wikipedia. (you find one, and if you don't know how to tag it, just tell me.) I wonder how some of these gamers would react if we went into their hallowed halls and didn't bother to find out what was what rules-wise. Why don't we have a forum area? We do, in a way. The Administrators' boards, the Village Pumps and so on. All about the encyclopaedia and its content, We're not going to open up forum space to all and sundry who aren't here to help build the encyclopaedia, but who want to swap tips on their games, or racing pigeons, or to post the recipe of the month. There are plenty of free forum hosts, and there's Facebook etc, not to mention wordpress and weebly. Wikipedia is not free web space. Peridon (talk) 21:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If not A10, A11 Clearly made up. KonveyorBelt 23:34, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Super strong delete per WP:NOTGUIDE and WP:NOTFORUM, I don't think A10 works here. ansh666 00:12, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.