Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infegy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Infegy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was asked to restore this highly promotional article that I CSD G11'd. I trimmed the most obvious of the promotional material. There is nothing unique or important about this company. "Predicted" a superbowl win. What are the odds of that? (Ohh yeah, 50/50). Sources (were) primary including a PR. v/r - T P 19:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Article is about a social media analytics company. All sources in the article are press releases, and I'm not seeing anything better on Google News. (Hint; if it says the preeminent source for sentiment-driven web and social analytics, that ain't an independent source.) The Super Bowl story got picked up by The Atlantic[1] but that's still only one event. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:17, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:B2B and the complete lack of independent third party references. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:13, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.