Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industrie Clothing (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 00:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Industrie Clothing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company not notable and not covered well in sources it seems. Previous AfD ended with no consensus. Clothing company with limited history, tagged with multiple issues since as easy as 2013. -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as blatant corporate spam on an unremarkable business. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Cannot find anything to demonstrate notability. Aoziwe (talk) 11:58, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.