Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Industrie Clothing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR as per limited participation here. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Industrie Clothing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if this can be better improved as the best some of my searches found was this, this (this one has the most results with some news), this and this and although I haven't started looking closely at local news sources, this isn't very motivating and may have minimal local notability at best as one of the News links says they are a major company. Pinging past users Alexf, Randhirreddy and Takamaxa. It's worth noting this is what the article looked like when it started in May 2006 and this was once edited by an account "IndustrieClothing" in January 2013. SwisterTwister talk 06:36, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:38, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

merge to David Jones Limited; this enterprise is now owned an operated as a division of that notable chain. DGG ( talk ) 23:16, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 16:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.