Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indonesian Veterinary Training Program
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Indonesian Veterinary Training Program (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The program exists, but there's no evidence it's notable. StarM 04:35, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 04:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 04:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 04:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 04:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Google isn't god. Mgm|(talk) 09:15, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment no it isn't, but it's a damn good possibility that if google doesn't show any discussion of an international partnership, including non reliable sources, that it isn't notable. Hell the org's own website barely mentions it. StarM 13:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Agree that Google isn't god, but for a nomination for deletion, it does indicate that the nominator did some research before nominating the article for deletion. Additionally, Google news, books, and scholar turn up nothing either. In other words, this program has no reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 10:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 19:34, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Somehow I managed to overlook the US mentioned here and figured that we should try to look in some Indonesian language. Obviously that line of thought is no longer relevant. - Mgm|(talk) 23:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.