Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indo-Pakistani War of 1971-Inside Secret

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971-Inside Secret[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

POV fork of Indo-Pakistani War of 1971. The propagandistic tone makes it unsuitable for merging, DGG ( talk ) 05:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, absolutely agree with the nominator.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination Nick-D (talk) 03:55, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a long-winded POV fork. Any worthwhile material should be merged back to the main article. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:12, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: a POVFORK as mentioned in the nomination and per copy right violations. I am tagging the article for speedy per copy right violations. --SMS ^Talk 12:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.