Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Individual growth
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 16:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Individual growth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article is unreferenced, so it fails wikipedia's most fundamental policy, of verifiability. The edit screen for creation of a new article clearly warns editors that unreferenced material may be deleted, and this article has been tagged as unreferenced since June 2006, which is quite long enough for references to be have been added. However, they haven't been added, and after 21 months it's time for this article to be deleted as unverified. A new article on the subject may of course be written in future, if it is referenced to met WP:V and to establish notability.
(A PROD in August 2006 was contested, hence this AFD rather than a PROD). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC) BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete very low quality stub with little potentialDGG (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Maybe this could be transwikied to Wiktionary if they want it. —BradV 23:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- What did Wiktionary do to you that you'd want to inflict this on them? ;) --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 05:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.