Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indigo Moss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 14:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Indigo Moss

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Indigo Moss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't believe the couple of minor reviews meet the standards set at WP:NBAND. --woodensuperman 13:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --woodensuperman 13:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• Comment I deprodded because in two minutes on Google found the following newspaper reviews:
  • Coventry Telegraph
  • The Guardian

  The duo the band became, Trevor Moss and Hannah-Lou (sometimes referenced in the opposite order), actually seems more notable. It would make sense to make the article primarily about them with Indigo Moss background:

  • KLOF Mag
  • The Guardian
  • South Wales Argus
  • Americana UK

  I have not looked any further. Thryduulf (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

  Still not convinced this is WP:SIGCOV. --woodensuperman 16:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

• Keep and expand. Even the first two found by @Thryduulf are great refs, and in the Guardian at that? Nice how bringing an article to AfD encourages people to look for references. --Ouro (blah blah) 17:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

  I'm not convinced, that Guardian review is pretty minor coverage really. --woodensuperman 11:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 19:28, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
• Keep in view of the reliable sources coverage identified above as well as coverage in The Times and Sunday Times (exercising WP:AGF) as they are deadlinked in the article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:48, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
• Keep per demonstrated significant coverage in national newspapers. --Michig (talk) 22:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep I agree that there is coverage ThreeBootsInABucket (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources per WP:BAND. Wikishovel (talk) 09:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.