Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian states ranked by HIV awareness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 04:25, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indian states ranked by HIV awareness

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per WP:RAWDATA, this seems to be an indiscriminate list of data with no context and poor sourcing. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 09:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleteper WP:RAWDATA and per nominators reasoning. On the whole, quite a useless article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree. This article is inappropriate and not worth keeping. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 14:43, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don’t know where to start with this, and thankfully I don’t think I have to, since it looks like this is already moving towards deletion. Woerich (talk) 04:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete total listcruft that adds no value to encyclopedia. Yoonadue (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. This is not an encyclopedic topic, and the article is useless. Natureium (talk) 14:25, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I think there is no limit to the amount of similar lists that could be generated; not useful to for building an encyclopedia. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 10:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Per nominator, the article has no use for its reader and is not encyclopedic. Alex-h (talk) 10:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.