Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/India Mein Lahore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

India Mein Lahore[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article about an upcoming film - the problem is that it has been "upcoming" since 2013, the official website of the film (indiameinlahore.com) is dead, and when I looked for sources I found an official statement from the producers from 2014 saying that the movie is "on hold". There are a few rather meager sources in the article about the original plans, and I also found this fairly substantial article, but a shelved movie project doesn't meet any of the WP:MOVIE criteria and the existing coverage doesn't meet WP:GNG.

It should also be mentioned that the user who started the article was subsequently blocked as a sock of a previously blocked user, and it appears that one reason the article was created was to advertise a nn person and their company - currently there are no such problems in the article, but it's there in the history. bonadea contributions talk 19:08, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

in looking further:

type:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

star:Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

star:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and WP:INDAFD: India Mein Lahore Ikram Akhtar Rajesh R. Tripathi Mohammad Asif Moosa Khan

Redirect temporarily with a partial merge to its arguably notable writer/director Ikram Akhtar. Even though its filming has been confirmed, and elements of the slow production (cast, creww, director, filming, locations, ect.) have received more-than-trivial coverage to meet WP:NFF for an unreleased project, the redirect can be reversed if or when we have confirmation of a release date. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 09:20, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect only as there's nothing actually emphasizing the needed solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No clear consensus yet on this debate. st170e^talk 00:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:00, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.