Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Music Awards (Music Resource Group)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:20, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Independent Music Awards (Music Resource Group)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam for non notable defunkt award farm. Refbombed to PR, reproductions of routine notices and primary sources. Lack coverage in independent reliable sources.
Previously deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Music Awards. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:42, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and Awards. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:26, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Source 2 and 14 are green per source tool, I guess it's ok. Notability is established. Oaktree b (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't even make the effort to actually look at the sources the you really shouldn't be !voting. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source two is a list of the winners, source 14 has now been removed. Oaktree b (talk) 15:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So you still haven't bothered actually looking at the sources. No it is not a list of winners. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the existing sources are any good. They're all either routine announcement presumably reproduced from the subject, or "X teams up with" type articles which are not independent. If these awards are to have any notability there really ought to be something written about them (rather than merely relaying who won) by someone truly independent of them. Elemimele (talk) 07:00, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There don't seem to be any sources about the actual Awards, and at most press release-style announcements of them happening. I think this article needs at least one or two independent sources actually focussing on the Awards themselves as an event. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortador (talk • contribs)
Delete Not really seeing any good independent coverage of the awards. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:39, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.