Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inclusive Wicca Tradition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inclusive Wicca Tradition[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N and has no WP:RS, with little evidence that there are any independent, reliable sources on the subject Woodsy lesfem (talk) 04:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paganism-related deletion discussions. Woodsy lesfem (talk) 04:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. I could find no IRS at all. Not even one to support a single due weight sentence in Wicca. 23:09, 22 December 2018 Aoziwe (talk) 11:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete self promotion. Syed Zain Ul Abideen Bukhari (talk) 15:47, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.