Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inayatullah Faizi (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 22:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inayatullah Faizi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This BLP has been discussed before, at a prior deletion debate in October 2017. At that time, the outcome was "keep", but I do rather feel that in-depth analysis of the sources was lacking during that debate, and there's an opportunity for us to discuss it more thoroughly. Strictly speaking the article may well qualify for speedy deletion under CSD X2, but as the article has been kept at a previous AfD I thought it better to renominate than to try to speedy it. —S Marshall T/C 17:45, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the only source is a PR piece about him from a university he was in some way connected to. Nothing even remotely close to being an indepedent, reliable 3rd party source is present in the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I agree with the nominator that the decision of the previous AfD was unconvincing. But because of the language barrier I am not likely able to look for sources very effectively. I'd be willing to change my mind if sufficient in-depth independent reliable sourcing on him or his books can be found, regardless of its language. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.