Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inari Amertron Berhad

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:06, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inari Amertron Berhad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No assertion of notability or that it meets WP:CORP also only substantial contributors are two accounts, both who have never edited outside of this article and one of which has the company name in their username. Mifter (talk) 23:20, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- the company could be notable as it's WP:PUBLIC, but the content is strictly promotional, so WP:NOT outweighs any marginal notability that the subject might have. If the company is indeed notable (of which I'm not not convinced just yet), then non-SPA contributors would eventually create it. There's no rush to achieve this state however. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - the promotional tone and inline external linking problems means the article would require a fundamental re-write. This negates the dubious claim to notability it makes. DrStrauss talk 09:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.