Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inacronym
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Addhoc (talk) 15:21, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Inacronym[edit]
- Inacronym (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Speedy declined; maybe it's not blatant, but this is disguised advertising. It looks at first sight like a rather gimmicky neologism about a "new communications paradigm"; but when you click the link at the bottom you get taken to Inacronym.com, and it turns out that what they really want is to generate you a sort of personal logo and then (click on the "Shop" tab) sell you custom VIPATM T-shirts for $19.99, sweat-shirts for $32, hoodies for $38.99, etc. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, subtle advertising is still advertising. Also seems to be a neologism. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete – I always hate saying; “….Agree with nominator”. However, this time, yes. Could find no information on the word or the company, other than the web site. As Lankiveil points out, advertising is still called advertising even though cloaked as an article. Shoessss | Chat 13:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the author Jive01 (talk · contribs) is a suspected sock of Jbpadgett (talk · contribs) who was blocked yesterday for producing a large number of advertising articles including a first version of this. JohnCD (talk) 14:17, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn, WP:NEO, adv. JJL (talk) 18:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per nom, adding the info that the CEO of the company created the article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toddst1 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clearly spam. Gwernol 14:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.