Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Your Phone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Beach House 3. There's some question about the proper redirect target. If somebody wants to be WP:BOLD and change this to point to Ty Dolla Sign discography, I have no problem with that. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:26, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In Your Phone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONGS. An album track with no notability. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 21:07, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. Valid search term, can be repointed to Ty Dolla Sign discography, as it was in the first place. Ss112 22:05, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This song is a single from the album. There is notability behind it backing it up. Yes, it does need more information behind and citation to back up it up. I feel as though it's a keeper. Both artist collaborated on the song and it features another artist. I think that's enough for it to stand alone as an article. The song is in fact released in you search for it on the net. You can purchase the song on iTunes and other places. This is not just a song from the album but a single itself.Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment single release (or lack thereof) has nothing to do with whether songs warrant articles, and artists featured on it are also entirely moot. What they need per WP:Notability (music)#Songs (WP:NSONGS) is multiple legitimate secondary sources outside of album reviews that cover this in a fair amount of detail (preferably more than a paragraph) and aren't just based off of artist/label/producer/songwriter commentary (which would basically be self-promotion). There should also be enough information available on the song itself (not just parent album filler) to create more than just a stub. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:32, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 05:46, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Beach House 3 per nom. The creator's reasoning for keeping the article is obviously invalid, they clearly do not understand NSONGS. Hayman30 (talk)
Redirect to Beach House 3 - notability cannot be inherited. Nosebagbear (talk) 18:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.