Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Pursuit of Greed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In Pursuit of Greed

(Find video game sources: "In Pursuit of Greed" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Not reviewed in reliable sources. Fails WP:NVG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

keep as it WAS reviewed in reliable sources (one print press review was already in the article, more exist but are hard to trakc down). "PC Gamer 1996-08 by T. Liam Mcdonald" ... also, this article is just in the creation phase, give it some more time. Shaddim (talk) 10:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as passing WP:GNG with multiple reliable independent in-depth (reviews and otherwise) sources, such as WP:VG/RS. I see coverage in PC Gamer, PC Gamer DE, Computer Games Magazine, PC Games; also various publications like Level CZ, Score CZ and very likely others we haven't documented in our reference library or that are hard-to-search contemporary written publication. The sources in the article aren't great, but notability is not based on article quality. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:55, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 01:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Reach Out to the Truth 15:59, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not entirely sure why this was relisted; HK's check on sources is persuasive. Keep. --Izno (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.