Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Cauda Semper Stat Venenum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Courcelles (talk) 00:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In Cauda Semper Stat Venenum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage, largely unsourced content except for release date. JuggaloProghead (talk) 00:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages because they do not have coverage or sources either:

And these because they don't have significant coverage and minimal sources on Jacula

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:18, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Jacula. Sources include a band biography in AllMusic, a book that says the band name was drawn from a 1970s comic book, and a music periodical in the Italian language which reviews the band's 1972 album. Binksternet (talk) 21:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- There's also a band bio on Sputnik. Binksternet (talk) 15:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the relevant Italian articles provides two highly reputable book sources about the bands [1] [2], sources above by Binksternet are also valid. Cavarrone 09:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: We need more discussion about the albums. Courcelles (talk) 04:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 04:58, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 09:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In Cauda Semper Stat Venenum. Sources: AllMusic, ProgVisions, Psychedelic Baby, Onda Rock. Binksternet (talk) 15:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Tardo Pede In Magiam Versus. Sources: AllMusic1, Psychedelic Baby, Onda Rock, and AllMusic2. Binksternet (talk) 15:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- After seeing lots of sources online in English and Italian, and some snippets of Italian periodicals from the 1970s, I have to say Keep All. All of the articles are notable enough. Binksternet (talk) 16:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.