Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InTopSens
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 08:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
InTopSens[edit]
- InTopSens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Previously speedy deleted page, that even though has had a lot of work on it fails WP:GNG.
The ref's given are as follows :
- GRACE Related Projects: InTopSens - is at least part written by the article's creator and member of the project.
- Quadriga Newsletter - the project is mentioned only in one 5 line section in a 7 page newsletter.
- Blood poisoning bacteria identified faster has the feel of a press release.
- Farfield to Join New Research Consortium called "INTOPSENS" also has the feel of a press release.
As such feel that the coverage does not meet the WP:GNG, with regard to being both significant and independent. Codf1977 (talk) 11:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 11:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 11:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 11:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG as per nom, despite the hard work on the part of the nom and the author to make this article work. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is part of a long-running spam project aimed at inserting promotional articles on European research projects. A typical such article will be loaded with unhelpful jargon and vaguely described in terms of their "forward looking" aims, rather than actual achievements, as is this one: The consortium aims to develop a compact polymer and silicon-based CMOS-compatible Lab on a Chip sensor platform which is based on two label-free biomolecular recognition optical sensor technologies. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this research project. Joe Chill (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is insignificant and hasn't given anything for the biomedical sector. HaterofIgnorance (talk) 00:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.