Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InMarket
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:40, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- InMarket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sure if the references support notability under WP:CORP. This seems to be a borderline case to me, but I'm still hesitant. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:17, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.