Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imran Riaz Khan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is for the article to be retained. North America1000 02:10, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Riaz Khan[edit]

Imran Riaz Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No level of notability, only sources are youtube channels. Zippybonzo | talk 16:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Pakistan. Shellwood (talk) 16:51, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Sources definitely fail WP:RS however the subject of the article has 2.94 million subscribers on Youtube. I would think that this generally points towards passing WP:N. As the article stands, I would lean towards deletion but I would likely keep for a WP:HEY. GoldMiner24 Talk 17:07, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Followers, likes, watches, subs are a bad measure of notability because there is no standard (not in terms of Wikipedia, but in general) for them - it is well documented that all of these can also be bought. We rely on significant, independent coverage in reliable sources. Wikipedia isn't a stat book for how many people watched a YT video. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:16, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "Imran Riaz Khan Biography – Anchor & Journalist Age – Wife". Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  2. ^ "Samaa News Fired News Anchor Imran Riaz Khan for Supporting Imran Khan". Startup Pakistan. 9 April 2022. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  3. ^ "Anchor Imran Riaz Khan joins Express News". The Namal. 10 May 2022. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  4. ^ "Imran Riaz Khan Inside Story | Ex PM Imran Khan vs Imported Government | Pakistan News Room". BOL News. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  5. ^ Khalid, Usama (4 May 2022). "Hoshyarian Eid Special | Imran Riaz Khan | 4th MAY 2022". Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  6. ^ "Islamabad: Anchor Imran Riaz Khan has reportedly been taken off air by Samaa TV. | Pakistan Press Foundation (PPF)". www.pakistanpressfoundation.org. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  7. ^ Khan, Imad. "On the Wrong Side of the Government, Pakistani Journalists Turn to YouTube". CNET. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  8. ^ "PM postpones address to nation, discusses threat letter with journalists". Samaa. 30 March 2022. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  9. ^ "Journalist Imran Khan who victim-blamed Noor Mukadam is reportedly a friend of Zahir Jaffer's lawyer". MM News TV. 12 August 2021. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  10. ^ "Anchor Imran Riaz Khan illegally killed Black & Grey Partridges in a protected area". The Pakistan Daily. 28 November 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  11. ^ Mehmood, Munazza (11 August 2021). "Anchor Imran Riaz Khan Clarifies His Stance on 'Victim-Blaming' Noor Mukadam [Video]". Lens. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  12. ^ "Pakistani TV anchors' palace like houses and lavish life style raising many questions". PakDestiny. 5 November 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  13. ^ Mustafa, Muahmmad (26 July 2020). "Sharif Brothers Corruption Plan Revealed Anchor Imran Riaz Khan". NetMag Pakistan. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  14. ^ "TV anchor's argument with female politician sparks criticism". Daily Times. 2 July 2020. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  15. ^ "FBR serves notice on journalist Imran Riaz Khan for income tax audit". Pakistan Today. 8 May 2022. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  • Comment  – I've ton of references opened in other tabs, showing him qualifying WP:JOURNALISTS, WP:ANYBIO, WB:BASIC and even WP:GNG. Already added maybe 15 refs, but if I'll add more it'll look nothing less than refbombing (as it already kinda looks). Radioactive (talk) 05:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • KEEP Article can be much improved due to Radioactive 's efforts and above reliable sources he located. Definitely worth keeping! Ngrewal1 (talk) 17:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this is complete spam, the sources above aren't reliable sources and a laughably bad attempt to keep spam. PRAXIDICAE💕 17:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'd just like to note for the closer that many of these keeps are without basis - the sources above are 1E or unreliable. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:53, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.