Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Improve Digital

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 14:27, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Improve Digital

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Extraordinarily promotional article: the listing of every possible person in key people is diagnostic. I don't think there's enough notability to make rewriting appropriate. that the product is used in a niche role by major companies is not notability . That they received minor awards for being a rapidly growing start up is not notability -- if anything, it's more likely to mean not yet notable. Every one of the many references is simply one of the many press releases.

WP should not be used for the purpose of being another one. accepted from AfC , like so many similar articles. DGG ( talk ) 01:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.