Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impressive Instant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Music (Madonna album). MBisanz ^talk 02:44, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Impressive Instant

Fails notability per WP:NSONGS. Article is almost entirely OR. No references. The authenticity of image used is dubious as well - cannot be found on the website stated by the person who posted image, and looks fake. Paul75 (talk) 09:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 19:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Was released as a club promo only, never a single, ~~never charted~~, article has no sources to show it had external notability. PHARMBOY (TALK) 00:40, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- changed to weak. What it charted on gives it a tiny amount of something, but not sure that is enough. PHARMBOY (TALK) 11:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Music (Madonna album). Fluffed-up permastub. Nothing sourced, and no reason to believe most of it is sourceable. The interminable list of remixes that these things get are not a reason for keeping an article, and that is what this article primarily is.—Kww(talk) 11:37, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Was considered a single in its own right and still charted, but didn't go commercially on sale. As long as there is enough substance, the article should stay. Geoking66_talk 04:47, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "considered a single in it's own right" is pure OR!

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.