Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Republic of Kčelzora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was : Speedily deleted by User:SarahStierch. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:54, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imperial Republic of Kčelzora

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Tag was removed without reason. See removed PROD tag for a viable reason to delete. Insulam Simia (^talk/_contribs) 20:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possible hoax (or blatantly non-notable at best); in any case, in-universe history of a nation from a fiction book. No Google hits for either the name of the nation or the author (except copies of the Wikipedia article), and nothing relevant for the book. Also, if the writer is obviously not Russian, why is his name spelled in Cyrillic? Strong (possibly speedy) delete. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:36, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Also nominating Zarv'akcs, language from the same book. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the comment from the article's creator on the talk page, I suggest speedily deleting the article as promotional. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as prod nominator, article is about a fictional town with author page and novel page that doesn't exist. Karl 334 ^Talk-^-Contribs 20:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find no sign at Amazon of this book (there is a Scott J. Burnley who is not this author), and that is not a good sign. Listing there means a thing exists, but does not mean any notability per se. Not being listed there means non-notable (unless very old and out of print but still remembered). Possibly hoax, possibly not yet published, possibly I've missed something. Without evidence in WP:RS reliable independent sources, definitely non-encyclopaedic. (I am also rather dubious about an elven imperial republic, but that's another matter not a reason for deletion...) Peridon (talk) 20:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.