Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impaled Nazarene

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Impaled Nazarene

This article is technically speediable as A, since it makes no assertion of notability. It also lacks reliable independent sources. Guy (Help!) 21:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Not a good speedy candidate at all, since the subject has received coverage in news. One of their albums was apparently banned in Germany. Apart from their album getting banned in Germany and the few trivial mentions in mainstream publications, there isn't much notability to be had. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 21:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 21:14, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Beloved Freak 21:15, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multiple albums on Osmose records means they pass WP:MUSIC. Although I haven't followed it for many years, they've had significant coverage in magazines such as Terrorizer. Prune the unsourced crap, but a proper article can be written. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 21:20, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My gosh, is this band notable. A look at the interwikis should give some indication, as will a peek at their Bio at Allmusic. Chubbles (talk) 21:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Apparently, they were on the Finnish charts. Combined with the other coverage, that's notable enough for me. Celarnor ^{Talk to me} 21:41, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sources are needed for the article, but Keep per Chubbles. sparkl_!sm ^hey! 21:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep RS should be added, but otherwise the article passes WP:MUSIC. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:MUSIC#C5. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 23:08, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keeep per 71 google news hits [1].Merkin's mum 23:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Keep. MrFish^{Go Fish} 00:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously passes WP:MUSIC. Could do with some work, but definitely notable band. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 00:13, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per all the above. I'm not even remotely familiar with black metal bands from Finland and even I have heard of this somewhat notorious band. --Bardin (talk) 04:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Passes point 5 of WP:MUSIC - several albums on indie labels, plus all of the above. Lugnuts (talk) 07:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.