Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immortal heros

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:37, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Immortal heros[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was previously speedy deleted under G3 as a hoax a short while ago. It was recreated by a WP:COI editor, and then deProded by same editor without addressing the concern. This series fails WP:NBOOK, as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and I am unable to find reliable source coverage to establish notability for this series of books which "will be released soon" according to the previous version of the article. It seems that deletion with salt may be necessary. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:35, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless article author can present sources. --Chris (talk) 22:36, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Reliable, third-party sources of course. --Chris (talk) 22:41, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only mention I can find of this anywhere apart from the Wikipedia article is a Facebook message, the full text of which is "Immortal Heros. This i written by my owner Jack Addison Bressler. Not for kids under seven for mild langangue, gore & violenece. Bark Bark!" I also note that the article claims this is a "new series", and yet says that there are 23 books in the series. Almost certainly a hoax, and if not then totally non-notable. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The author of this article states that he is the author of the series "Immortal Heros". He also stated in an edit which is now deleted that the author of the series is ten years old. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:15, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.