Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immigration consultant

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Immigration consultant

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contents not supported by references. As the references make clear this is a field populated by unqualified fraudsters. Not what the article implies at all. Rathfelder (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Wikipedia is not for cleanup, and Afd not for removing objectionable material (otherwise Donald Trump would be target #1, also #2, #3, ...). In Canada, you can become certified as a Regulated Canadian Immigration Consultant after training.[1] California has an Immigration consultant checklist. Maryland has a list of what such consultants cannot legally do and a " Maryland Immigration Consultant Act, Md. Code Ann. Commercial Law §§ 14-3301 to 14-3306".[2] I may get around to overhauling the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:15, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep ,not fully convinced by the references ,it qualifies for WP:HEY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Georgiamarlins (talk • contribs) 20:32, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.